Software Quality Engineer - (Remote - US)

The Software Quality Engineer at Jobgether is responsible for ensuring software quality by developing test plans, executing both manual and automated tests, identifying and logging defects, and collaborating with cross-functional teams to enhance the software development lifecycle. This role plays a crucial part in maintaining the reliability of software products.

Candidates applying for the Software Quality Engineer position at Jobgether should possess proficiency in C#, JavaScript, and strong comprehension of Angular frameworks. Hands-on experience with .NET Core, Selenium, Cypress, and API testing tools like Postman are also vital. A solid understanding of QA methodologies and tools is essential for success in this role.

The Software Quality Engineer role at Jobgether is remote, providing a flexible work environment that encourages collaboration. This position supports an inclusive culture, allowing engineers to thrive while engaging with colleagues across geographical boundaries.

Jobgether ensures software quality through the Software Quality Engineer’s responsibilities of developing test plans, performing various levels of testing, creating automated scripts, and collaborating with development teams to identify and resolve defects, solidifying a robust software development lifecycle.

Jobgether supports career growth for Software Quality Engineers by offering professional development opportunities, a collaborative culture, and exposure to various projects that enhance their skill sets. Employees are encouraged to pursue their career aspirations while contributing to innovative product delivery.

When answering this question, highlight specific tools you have used, like Selenium or Cypress, and describe projects where you implemented them successfully. Discuss your approach to creating automated tests and how this improved testing efficiency and software quality.

Explain your process for task prioritization, mentioning factors such as project deadlines, the severity of defects, and team collaboration. Providing an example of how you managed competing priorities during a sprint can help illustrate your response effectively.

Discuss your familiarity with defect tracking tools and your strategies for ensuring clear communication with development teams. Examples of how you’ve successfully resolved defects and your experience in logging and tracking issues will strengthen your answer.

Identify common challenges such as rapidly changing requirements or tight deadlines, and then explain how you approach these challenges. Sharing a personal experience where you overcame a specific QA obstacle will also illustrate your resilience and problem-solving abilities.

Share your proactive approach to continuous learning through online courses, webinars, or QA-specific communities. Mention any certifications or training you’ve undertaken, and how this ongoing education translates to better performance in your role.

Provide a specific example of how you raised awareness about quality standards within your team. Discuss the actions you took, and the positive impact it had on the project and the team’s approach to quality assurance moving forward.

Highlight any specific performance testing tools you have utilized, like JMeter or LoadRunner. Describe a project where you conducted performance tests, your findings, and the crucial adjustments made as a result.

Discuss techniques you use for comprehensive manual testing, such as creating detailed test cases based on requirements, leveraging exploratory testing, and engaging with the development team for insights. Sharing a thorough testing success story can also enrich your response.

Talk about how crucial communication is in ensuring alignment between QA, development, and other stakeholders. Discuss strategies you employ to foster effective communication, like regular meetings or updates, and share an experience that illustrates this importance.

Explain your approach to conflict resolution, emphasizing the importance of understanding different perspectives. Describe a specific situation where you navigated a disagreement, highlighting your focus on achieving a consensus that ultimately improved the QA processes.