Manual QA Backend/Web

As a Manual QA Backend/Web at LucidLink, your primary roles include creating and executing test cases, identifying product defects and verifying fixes, and collaborating closely with development teams to ensure the quality and reliability of our software solutions. Your focus will be on backend operations and web applications, where your attention to detail will shine as you proactively seek feedback and explore areas for improvement.

To succeed as a Manual QA Backend/Web at LucidLink, candidates should possess advanced computer literacy and several years of relevant experience in the IT industry. Exceptional logical thinking, problem-solving skills, and a solid understanding of backend and web development will help you excel in this role. While a university degree in Computer Science or a related field is considered a plus, a passion for quality assurance and a keen eye for detail are paramount.

In the role of Manual QA Backend/Web at LucidLink, you will be responsible for creating new test cases and plans, executing regression tests, identifying and tracking product defects, and collaborating with teams to improve processes. Your role will also involve exploring products to discover weaknesses and learning about customer uses to ensure we meet real-world expectations.

LucidLink offers a range of comprehensive benefits for our Manual QA Backend/Web roles, including flexible PTO, competitive salaries, stock options packages, and employer-sponsored healthcare. We prioritize our employees' well-being and strive to create a supportive work environment that encourages your growth and success.

LucidLink is dedicated to the growth and development of its employees, especially in roles like Manual QA Backend/Web. We encourage continuous learning through collaborative projects and regular interaction with experienced team members. You'll be exposed to various applications and technologies, allowing you to gain valuable experience and advance your career within a rapidly growing organization.

As a Manual QA Backend/Web, I focus on creating test cases that cover both functional and non-functional requirements. I use techniques like equivalence partitioning and boundary value analysis to create effective test cases. Moreover, collaboration with developers to understand user stories and product requirements is crucial for developing comprehensive tests.

During my previous role, I discovered a critical defect that affected user data integrity. By conducting thorough exploratory testing, I was able to identify the specific conditions that triggered the defect. I promptly reported it to the dev team, and we worked quickly to remedy the issue before the release, demonstrating the importance of robust testing processes.

I prioritize test cases based on risk assessment and impact on the end user. High-risk areas or features that are critical to the application’s functionality are tested first. Additionally, I consider factors such as the frequency of use and recent changes during prioritization to maximize our testing efficiency.

I have experience using various tools such as JIRA for defect tracking, TestRail for managing test cases, and Postman for API testing. Familiarity with these tools enables me to efficiently log issues, track progress, and maintain an organized approach to quality assurance.

I’ve encountered situations where developers may not perceive a reported defect as critical. In such cases, I present my findings clearly, including steps to reproduce the defect and the potential impact on users. This often leads to constructive discussions and, eventually, agreement on the validity of the defect. Maintaining open communication helps resolve conflicts effectively.

I actively engage in professional forums, attend webinars, and subscribe to QA-focused blogs and newsletters to stay updated with industry best practices. Additionally, I participate in local QA meetups and workshops to connect with other professionals and learn about new testing tools and methodologies.

I ensure thorough testing by creating detailed test scenarios that cover various aspects of the application, including edge cases and negative testing. I also conduct peer reviews of test cases to gain different perspectives and enhance their coverage. Continuous feedback loops with developers and product managers further refine the comprehensiveness of our tests.

I view teamwork as essential in Manual QA roles. In my previous positions, I regularly collaborated with developers, product managers, and other QA testers. This collaboration involved daily stand-ups, sprint planning, and retrospectives, where we collectively strategized on testing approaches and shared insights, ensuring everyone remained aligned towards our common goals.

One of the most challenging aspects is managing test environments, especially when dealing with multiple versions of applications. To tackle this, I ensure that test data is consistently managed and that our environments are well-maintained. This allows me to focus on testing without disruptions, ensuring that all scenarios are effectively evaluated.

In exploratory testing, I would first familiarize myself with the feature by reviewing any available documentation to understand its purpose and functionality. Then, I would create exploratory test charters that guide me while allowing flexibility. Documentation of findings during this process is crucial for discussing potential improvements with the development team.