Mid-Senior Business Analyst

As a Mid-Senior Business Analyst at ETHICS CODE, your responsibilities include engaging with stakeholders to gather and document business requirements, facilitating workshops, developing business cases, conducting gap analyses, working closely with development teams, assisting with user acceptance testing, and contributing to process improvement initiatives.

To qualify for the Mid-Senior Business Analyst role at ETHICS CODE, you should have a Bachelor's degree in Business Administration, Computer Science, or a related field and 4-6 years of experience in business analysis, especially within software development projects. Familiarity with business analysis tools and methodologies is essential.

Key tools and methodologies for the Mid-Senior Business Analyst position at ETHICS CODE include proficiency in JIRA and Confluence, strong knowledge of business analysis methodologies, and experience with agile project management frameworks to manage and track project progress effectively.

Yes, the Mid-Senior Business Analyst position at ETHICS CODE is a 100% remote role, allowing you the flexibility to work from anywhere while collaborating with a globally distributed team on innovative projects.

Mid-Senior Business Analysts at ETHICS CODE can enjoy numerous benefits, including access to e-learning platforms, annual days off, referral bonuses, coverage for certifications, and the opportunity to work on projects from all around the world.

As a Mid-Senior Business Analyst, your role is pivotal; you will elicit requirements from stakeholders, document them effectively, and ensure that the development team has a clear understanding to deliver what is needed for successful project completion.

Gathering business requirements involves engaging with stakeholders through interviews, workshops, and surveys. To prioritize them, I utilize techniques such as the MoSCoW method to classify them into 'Must have', 'Should have', 'Could have', and 'Won't have'.

I utilize methodologies such as Agile for its iterative approach, which allows for regular feedback and adjustments, and Waterfall for projects with well-defined requirements. My choice depends on the project scope and stakeholder needs.

I conduct a gap analysis by comparing the current state and desired future state of business processes. This involves collecting data, identifying discrepancies, and developing actionable strategies to bridge those gaps effectively.

In a previous project, I facilitated a meeting between conflicting stakeholders to clearly outline each perspective. By guiding the discussion towards common goals and using objective criteria, we reached a compromise that aligned with the project's objectives.

I ensure the development team understands the requirements by doing thorough requirement documentation, holding clarification meetings, and utilizing visualization tools like mockups to illustrate complex ideas effectively.

My approach to UAT involves collaborating with end-users to define acceptance criteria, developing test scripts based on the requirements, and facilitating testing sessions to ensure the final product meets the business needs before launch.

I adapt my communication style by simplifying complex concepts, using analogies, and incorporating visuals to make information more relatable and understandable for non-technical stakeholders.

When requirements change during a project, I assess the impact through discussions with stakeholders and the development team, reprioritize as necessary, and ensure all parties are informed and aligned on the new direction.

The most challenging aspect is balancing stakeholder expectations and delivering on project timelines. I tackle this by maintaining open communication, regular updates, and managing scope effectively to ensure project success.