Navy Qualified Validator (NQV)

The Navy Qualified Validator (NQV) at H2 Performance Consulting is responsible for performing quality assurance reviews in accordance with RMF Steps 2, 4, and 5. This includes coordinating with Information System Security Engineers and Managers, executing vulnerability tests, and ensuring compliance with cybersecurity regulations. Additionally, you'll guide the team on specific cloud requirements and provide your expertise in Navy Cloud authorizations, ensuring all aspects of the Security Authorization Package are meticulously reviewed.

To apply for the Navy Qualified Validator position at H2 Performance Consulting, candidates must have a Secret Clearance, and either a Bachelor’s Degree or relevant experience. Candidates should also possess a minimum of three years of applied Department of Navy cybersecurity experience, specifically in Assessment and Authorization (A&A), as well as a Navy Qualified Validator (NQV) II certification in good standing.

A Navy Qualified Validator at H2 Performance Consulting ensures compliance by meticulously reviewing control assessments to gauge the current state of compliance. This involves evaluating whether sufficient evidence is provided to support control compliance and identifying any areas needing remediation or mitigation strategies based on the findings.

Collaboration is crucial for a Navy Qualified Validator at H2 Performance Consulting. You will work closely with various stakeholders, including Information System Security Engineers, Information System Security Managers, and Security Authorization liaisons, to manage and resolve processing requirements and issues that arise during the Security Authorization review process.

A Navy Qualified Validator at H2 Performance Consulting should be proficient in using tools such as Enterprise Mission Assurance Support Service (eMASS) for authorization reviews. Familiarity with other cybersecurity frameworks and standards related to Navy Cloud authorizations, such as FedRamp and DISA Provisional Authorizations, is also essential.

When answering this question, highlight specific projects where you conducted quality assurance reviews. Discuss the methodologies applied and the outcomes achieved, emphasizing how your contributions improved security compliance and facilitated successful assessments.

Begin by outlining the details of each RMF Step. For Step 2, discuss the selection of security controls; for Step 4, focus on security assessment; and Step 5, emphasize the continuous monitoring process. Relate these steps to your previous experiences in implementing these stages effectively.

Discuss your approach to risk management, mentioning the use of frameworks and risk assessment methodologies. Provide an example of a situation where you prioritized risks effectively and contributed to a successful mitigation strategy.

Provide a specific example of a project where teamwork was crucial. Illustrate your role, how you collaborated with others, and how the combined efforts led to successful security compliance. Highlight any challenges faced and how they were overcome.

Highlight your familiarity with various cloud technologies, their service models, and the security frameworks surrounding them. Discuss specific tools or services you've worked with and how you've applied cloud security best practices in your previous roles.

Explain the strategies you use to stay informed on the latest cybersecurity regulations, such as attending workshops, participating in relevant forums, or pursuing continual education. Providing examples of how you've implemented new regulations in past roles can strengthen your answer.

Describe the critical importance of documentation in cybersecurity, especially regarding compliance and audit readiness. Share how you ensure detailed and accurate documentation of your assessments, controls, and any findings to facilitate clear communication across teams.

Talk about the specific tools you've used, such as ACAS and STIGS, and how these tools helped in identifying vulnerabilities. Share examples of how you conducted tests, analyzed results, and recommended remedial actions based on your findings.

Discuss how you would gather additional evidence, collaborate with relevant stakeholders, and employ investigative methodologies to ensure a comprehensive understanding of compliance status. Provide an example if possible, demonstrating your problem-solving capabilities.

Outline the preparatory steps you would undertake, such as reviewing documentation, conducting internal assessments, and ensuring that all necessary personnel are briefed. Emphasize the importance of a proactive approach in achieving audit success.